You’ll not have seen this kind of writing from me, mainly because I rarely feel strongly about a topic as intangible as my beliefs to write about it. And I’m obviously only an armchair psychologist (so apologies to the professionals). But I found myself reiterating my view of Other People’s Behaviour to a friend the other day (and some of you might already have heard me spout on about it) and I thought it might be worth a try to put it on paper.
I have this theory. It’s based on my experience over the years of either working with or socialising with people I’ve struggled to get on with. And now because I’m retired and because other circumstances allowed me to find out who my true friends were and then allowed me to make new friends, I don’t have to associate with people I don’t want to. On the back of those changes, I’ve become more aware of why I like some people a lot and why I consciously steer away from some others – hence the theory.
My theory often kicks in shortly after meeting new people. With some people, there’s a gradually dawning realisation that I am not enjoying being in this person’s company. We have little in common, they aren’t in the slightest bit interested in me and I find I am experiencing forbearance rather than pleasure. I ask myself how I’m liking the conversation I’m not having because the person is doing virtually all the talking, not pausing for breath, almost exclusively about themselves or about things or people I have no knowledge of or interest in.
If there is a question asked about me, my answer provides them with an immediate opportunity to find a parallel in their own life and launch into another longwinded exposition of how much they have to say on the subject. By them talking in this way, there’s no opportunity for it be a dialogue, so I examine my surroundings in some detail, wonder how long it is till dinner or till they leave, and try to make an excuse to break the flow (like getting another drink which by then is much needed).
And once I come to this realisation, it’s a one-way street – there’s no going back. The person you’re with becomes an unbearable bore and that’s not going to change. They have no self-awareness, so they couldn’t appreciate that I am not happy ….. because they are happy, talking about themselves in front of a captive audience. They find what they’re saying interesting so that must mean everybody else will too.
I remember on one such occasion, there were three of us sitting at a table, one of the other two doing all the talking, and the other one happy about it. I was able to interject quite an animated view about some news item of fairly widely-held interest. I got blank looks as I went on, no reaction whatsoever from either of them, letting me run out of steam, and the talker then simply turned to other guy and resumed his journey down his chosen path.
But if it was just about people who like to do all the talking it wouldn’t be so bad. They’re the obvious ones and some of them are quite good company in small doses. Other behaviour is more insidious. There are those who let me down, who promise something and then don’t follow through. They either don’t apologise or don’t do it believably because a) they have nothing to apologise for, b) they are unaware they are letting me down, c) they have not considered the impact on me of letting me down, d) it’s not that important to them, e) something else came up that was more important to them which consumed their attention, f) or they just don’t care. And they don’t attempt to provide any cover for what they now aren’t going to do.
Each time, there’s nothing tangible, their excuses are valid and I can see why they have acted the way they have. The first few times, I give them the benefit of the doubt, I make allowances, I make alternative arrangements to cover the void they‘ve created, and I might even feel sorry for them that they have had to renege on the arrangement. But after a few times I start expecting they won’t come through and find my reservations are all too often proven, and again it’s a one-way street …. I can’t unsee this pattern – these are people I can’t rely on.
And then there’s the person who, under the mask of friendship, makes smug, snide, offensive comments to me about me while smiling at me. How do they it? Simple – they have a sense of entitlement that makes them believe in the sincerity of their view, now expressed, aired for my own good, to help me understand something important that, obviously to them, I was missing. Would I make a comment like that? Absolutely not, not even if I was thinking it. So why should I have to tolerate it from someone else? Because they’re a family member or a friend? Not enough of a reason. The former are harder to avoid, admittedly, but not impossible, and the latter are easier once you realise what’s going on. And why am I made to feel that I have a problem when clearly the problem is theirs which they need to pass on to me, unburdening themselves in so doing and feeling better about themselves? I don’t want people like that in my life.
Then it can get a bit more sinister. It strikes me that there is a fine line between a narcissist and a sociopath, and my experience is that someone who wasn’t like that when you first met them, over time may gradually change. The change may not be noticeable until it is, but as the change progresses, you find it’s always you who makes allowances for them, it’s you who accommodates them, even makes excuses for their behaviour or tries to normalise its impact, never the other way round.
It’s you who’s made to feel in the wrong, it’s you who feels you have to make things better, that the friendship or relationship depends on your behaviour not theirs. If there’s any possibility that they are in the wrong, they never apologise …. because in their eyes they’ve done nothing wrong. And don’t worry if they’ve hurt your feelings …. they don’t care how you’re feeling – there’s a complete lack of empathy for anybody else. It may take a while to realise what’s happening, but when you do, once again it’s a one-way street. Then it’s up to you what you do about it.
The key for me in dealing with all this was actually fairly straightforward. It was based on the realisation that I have a personal spectrum of behaviour that I find normal and acceptable – of course it’s my definition of normal but it’s important to me because it represents my tolerance level. Everyone has their own spectrum. The spectrum of others will match mine or overlap quite a lot or only a little. It will be wider for the more tolerant among us and the wider it is the more one ends up accommodating the behaviour of others.
The friends that I have, I like a lot and I am very comfortable being with them (hopefully it’s reciprocated although maybe not after reading this). I am lucky that my kids fall within the spectrum – not every parent can say that. The limited work I still do brings me in contact with the most delightful people and I have found that this awareness of my spectrum allows me to spot, or at least relate to, problems in isolated instances where this might not be the case. And it’s amazing these people stand out.
I can’t define my spectrum but I know when I’m in the company of someone who is inside it or outside it. Particularly because I’m retired, I have the luxury now of not often having to accept behaviour outside my boundaries, not so much by calling people out as I hate confrontation, but more just having as little as possible to do with those people. Life is a lot simpler.
That is what I mean by Other People’s Behaviour.
And here’s the perfect T-Shirt for me.











































































































